On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-12-21 at 11:04 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> this patch adds a bytea_agg aggregation.
>> It allow fast bytea concatetation.
> Why not call it string_agg? All the function names are the same between
> text and bytea (e.g., ||, substr, position, length). It would be nice
> not to introduce arbitrary differences.
Well, because it doesn't operate on strings.
I argued when we added string_agg that it ought to be called
concat_agg, or something like that, but I got shouted down. So now
here we are.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-12-23 18:38:14|
|Subject: Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2011-12-23 18:25:07|
|Subject: Re: patch: bytea_agg|