On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 15:19, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> create here is referring to the sepgsql permission, not the SQL
>>>> command, so it's correct as-is.
>>> My bad.
>> Here's an attempt at reworking the whole section to be more
>> understandable. I took the liberty of rearranging the text into
>> bulleted lists, which I hope is more clear.
>> Comments welcome.
> This looks a lot better, apart from:
> +1 from me.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tomas Vondra||Date: 2013-03-28 20:50:35|
|Subject: Re: Call for Google Summer of Code mentors, admins|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-03-28 19:46:52|
|Subject: Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2013-03-28 21:01:04|
|Subject: Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump.|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-03-28 19:57:48|
|Subject: pgsql: sepgsql: Documentation improvements.|