Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
Date: 2011-07-28 14:06:13
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYWg7oy3f40rvXFtdSAx2mq-=J_5Q7jwy960TYiKJkVcQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
<nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, in your case too an initdb would be required, so might as well go down
> the route of a new column. Any preferences for the name?
> connoinh
> conisonly
> constatic or confixed

I'd probably pick conisonly from those choices.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2011-07-28 14:17:09
Subject: Re: cheaper snapshots
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-07-28 14:06:00
Subject: Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group