Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Date: 2011-09-27 12:38:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYT-r7sjEen7N6Awo60qB6QWUCoR7xKwV4bBn1APywMYQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've committed this, but I still think it would be helpful to revise
>> that comment.  The turn "boosted up" is not very precise or
>> informative.  Could you submit a separate, comment-only patch to
>> improve this?
>>
> I tried to put more detailed explanation about the logic of do { ... } while
> loop of sepgsql_avc_check_valid and the cache field of new security label to
> be switched on execution of the procedure. Is it helpful?

I edited this and committed it along with a bunch of further
wordsmithing on the comments in that file.  Please let me know if you
see any isuses.

Thanks,

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vitor ReusDate: 2011-09-27 12:56:25
Subject: Re: CUDA Sorting
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-27 12:24:47
Subject: Re: heap_update temporary release of buffer lock

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group