| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences |
| Date: | 2012-01-20 01:02:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYQ=NtJKhBViPN40oe0BS72sif1e=fCPbZxO1d9oQroPA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> I think we should remove this from the TODO list, or at least document
>> >> that there are a number of reasons why it might be a deeper hole than
>> >> it appears to be at first glance.
>> >
>> > Maybe not remove it, but instead add a link to this discussion.
>>
>> I don't see what that accomplishes, unless someone's arguing that we
>> really do want this behavior...?
>
> Well, it documents what happened when we tried to do it. Sort of like
> "features we do not want". But then, maybe it's just TODO bloat.
I share your urge to memorialize the conversation somewhere, but I
fear it will just cause future people to spend time thinking about it
that isn't really warranted. I guess we could move it to the features
we do not want section, but that's mostly bigger picture stuff.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-20 02:42:52 | Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2012-01-20 00:29:41 | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |