Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alexey Kluykin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files
Date: 2011-07-17 01:50:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYKnDmOhNQADAAjPQUWMH_NeMUmyOcAyRwom3mivcxchw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> 2. Tentatively apply the new custom_variable_classes setting if any.

Is there any way that we could get *rid* of custom_variable_classes?
The idea of using a GUC to define the set of valid GUCs seems
intrinsically problematic.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-07-17 01:57:40 Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-17 01:47:40 Re: Is there a committer in the house?