On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>> Robert, all:
>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything
>> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major
>> configuration headache for our users.
> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and
> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
my list of things to worry about.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-06-26 21:17:12|
|Subject: Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-06-26 21:06:47|
|Subject: Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples|