Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-24 16:14:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY=pBEUNEn2RFaFp-obKnU_EJteHdR5zF6VfkknMbZ+SQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The semantics are clear: recovery.conf is read first, then
> postgresql.conf. It's easy to implement (1 line of code) and easy to
> understand.

Eh, well, if you can implement it in one line of code, consider my
objection withdrawn. I can't see how that would be possible, though.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kerem Kat 2011-09-24 16:24:16 Re: Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-24 16:13:34 Re: Large C files