From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |
Date: | 2011-07-29 18:38:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY7hZWXeTbkRJHPea_GWnwZAyydM8rCk1XbO1Zk8emO2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It would likely be better to not expose the struct type, just individual
> lookup functions.
I'm not sure about that... I think that's just going to introduce a
lot of excess notation.
>> And, a translation from ObjectType to type name (e.g "table", "type", ...)
>> is helpful to generate error messages.
>
>> const char *get_object_type_name(ObjectType objtype);
>
> Again, I think this is too low level because of message translation
> considerations.
On this point I agree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-07-29 18:44:15 | Re: include host names in hba error messages |
Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2011-07-29 18:12:37 | Re: Check constraints on partition parents only? |