Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Group commit, revised

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Group commit, revised
Date: 2012-01-27 13:38:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY2_q5BmgxO5TttjTt_dLa=ExO7MQJr7_4TTLOSwo5N2A@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, we have to be careful with any overhead in there, it can be a hot
> spot. I wouldn't expect any measurable difference from the above, though.
> Could I ask you to rerun the pgbench tests you did recently with this patch?
> Or can you think of a better test for this?

I can't do so immediately, because I'm waiting for Nate Boley to tell
me I can go ahead and start testing on that machine again.  But I will
do it once I get the word.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2012-01-27 13:48:41
Subject: Re: proposal: better support for debugging of overloaded functions
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-27 13:37:24
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group