Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Date: 2011-09-10 20:07:09
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> That's not my recollection.  Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
>> way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test
>> reports
>> from people who are not already contributors and could have used some
>> other way to get the code.
> Do we have download stats for the alphas?   Dave?

Download numbers for the installers were bordering on noise compared to the
GA builds last time I looked, double figures iirc. I don't know about the
tarballs offhand and can't check ATM.

Dave Page
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-10 20:17:32
Subject: pgsql: Add missing format attributes
Previous:From: Andy ColsonDate: 2011-09-10 19:59:08
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group