Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?
Date: 2012-05-07 08:11:49
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxpxKHUBfuLad3JwMzCH8QtMf6h_gsRFN0Gu6wqASJFqw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Monday, May 7, 2012, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Given that it's self contained, and we *do* expect it to get in
> eventually, how many places would you have to put #ifdef's in to leave
> the code in the main branch and just not have it build there?

If Guillaume is going to continue to work on the feature, I'd be happy with
#ifdef's and a configure switch to enable that code.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2012-05-07 08:29:16
Subject: Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-05-07 08:05:22
Subject: Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group