On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
>> 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
>> > Quick question: is trac the right tool?
>> Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized?
> Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a
> feature request to work on.
I think that's a reasonable and valuable use of it.
>> > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else?
>> Maybe are we using it the right way?
>> I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with
>> simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with
>> sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of
>> "progress" for tickets and milestones.
>> Which goals we want to achieve?
> For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests.
If anything we'll move to Redmine eventually, purely because that's
what we're using elsewhere in the project by default now.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dickson S. Guedes||Date: 2012-06-18 11:35:41|
|Subject: Re: PoC: Little improvements to EditGrid - Enum ComboBox|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2012-06-18 08:32:40|
|Subject: Re: Odp: pgAdmin website commit: Ugh, fix for a