Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper
Date: 2011-08-26 14:36:27
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 08/26/2011 07:27 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>>> Would it make sense to mention that in chapter 5.10
>>> of the documentation?
>> I don't think so, any more than any other external module should be
>> mentioned in the docs. There are known FDWs for several well known
>> external databases, several file formats, and more exotic data sources
>> such as twitter. I don't think we want to  maintain a list of these in
>> the docs.
> Wiki page, maybe?

For example this one:

Dave Page
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-08-26 15:22:25
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Previous:From: Alexander KorotkovDate: 2011-08-26 14:31:23
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group