Re: Why so slow?

From: Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>
To: Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro(at)path(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why so slow?
Date: 2012-02-18 05:29:15
Message-ID: CA+CSw_vPcZoYhgpcHdLHqYbuRiH=YCHuC0SDfJc8DcZJopEXow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Feb 17, 2012 8:35 PM, "Alessandro Gagliardi" <alessandro(at)path(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is the EXPLAIN: http://explain.depesz.com/s/ley
>
> I'm using PostgreSQL 9.0.6 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC
gcc-4.4.real (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3, 32-bit
>
> My random_page_cost is 2 and yet it still insists on using Seq Scan on
blocks.

As could be inferred from the row counts, it's slow because its joining and
then aggregating a quarter of the blocks table. The hash join with its
sequential scan is probably the correct choice for that type of join, it's
the join itself that should be optimized out. The optimizer doesn't figure
out that the join can be turned into a semi join if the output is
aggregated with distinct and is from only one of the tables (in this case,
because the output is the join key, it can be from either table).

To make the optimizers job easier you can rewrite it as a semi-join
explicitly:
SELECT DISTINCT(user_id) FROM seen_its WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM blocks
WHERE blocks.user_id = seen_its.user_id) AND seen_its.created BETWEEN
(now()::date - interval '8 days')::timestamp AND now()::date::timestamp

--
Ants Aasma

In response to

  • Why so slow? at 2012-02-17 18:34:50 from Alessandro Gagliardi

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Horn 2012-02-18 14:50:28 Query slow as function
Previous Message Alessandro Gagliardi 2012-02-17 22:20:29 Re: Why so slow?