Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-07-02 20:48:42
Message-ID: C8D4C47E-2ED1-4F9A-A1AA-D1EBBB997EEB@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jul 2, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

>> No, I removed that because that table has only operators, no functions. Seehttp://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/hstore.html.
> 
> The section contains two tables.  Table F-5 is called "hstore
> operators", and table F-6 is called "hstore functions", and those two
> tables together make up a section called "F.13.2 hstore operators and
> functions".

Oh. Duh.

David

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-02 20:52:08
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-02 20:45:44
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group