Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited

From: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited
Date: 2010-09-22 03:53:13
Message-ID: C709E959-F268-48D3-B6C5-89A35C0FC749@themactionfaction.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Offhand I think I like Andrew's recommendation of a shortlived branch
> better. In essence your idea is using the tip of "master" itself as a
> shortlived branch, which is maybe a bit too cute. If you get distracted
> and need to do something else for awhile, the tip of "master" is not
> where you want your not-yet-pushable work to be.

For uncommitted work, see also "git stash".
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-stash.html

Cheers,
M

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-22 04:36:24 Re: wip: functions median and percentile
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-22 03:47:30 Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited