On Nov 5, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
>> Is there any reason why Postgres should not support an "ALTER TABLE
>> tablename [IF EXISTS]" feature?
> I think you've phrased the question backwards. Why *should* we support
> that large increment of complexity? The use-cases seem pretty few and
> far between.
Obviously we have different definitions of "a large increment in complexity".
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-11-05 15:44:14|
|Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ... IF EXISTS feature? |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-11-05 14:56:01|
|Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |