Re: Mailing list failure WAS: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mailing list failure WAS: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-27 02:06:05
Message-ID: C633F522E08F6E60969A3FFD@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 14:57:33 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:47:09 -0800
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Robert,
>>
>> > Interesting, seems pghackers dropped me from the list, so I missed
>> > several messages in the thread.
>>
>> Huh. I thougth this was just my full mailbox ... I missed all of the
>> messages this weekend. Who else got nailed?
>>
>> Marc?
>>
>
> I have received all messages as far as I can tell.

*dons hat of shame and goes to sit in the corner*

Hate to admit, but ... my fault. This weekend, I generated a list of email
addresses that have been bouncing messages to sent to them, scanned the list
for anyone that I recognized so that they didn't get removed, and unregistered
the rest :( Looks like I scanned *too* fast and missed several ppl ... this
was purely human error on my part :(

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHxMWN4QvfyHIvDvMRAs1LAJ4su3mVq5vf6gbIcnY37woC8vRhnACg4KSK
ua9mbK9MvLjYPlhwig9WPik=
=K+uH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2008-02-27 02:35:55 Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2008-02-27 02:05:44 Re: One more option for pg_dump...