| From: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 19:54:58 |
| Message-ID: | C386A5B0-A199-4ECE-9E91-66E37B827A72@pointblue.com.pl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
On 21 Jan 2010, at 09:37, Dave Page wrote:
> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>
> Wait for it....
>
> 9.0.
darn, looks like PostgreSQL developers can only count to 4 :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | svn | 2010-01-21 20:20:13 | SVN Commit by guillaume: r8164 - in branches/REL-1_10_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3/pgadmin: dlg schema |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-01-21 19:38:56 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rafael Martinez | 2010-01-21 20:10:36 | PITR backup history files with identical 2nd part file names |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-01-21 19:52:08 | Re: Application name patch - v3 |