Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 19:54:58
Message-ID: C386A5B0-A199-4ECE-9E91-66E37B827A72@pointblue.com.pl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
On 21 Jan 2010, at 09:37, Dave Page wrote:

> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
> 
> Wait for it....
> 
> 9.0.

darn, looks like PostgreSQL developers can only count to 4 :)



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rafael MartinezDate: 2010-01-21 20:10:36
Subject: PITR backup history files with identical 2nd part file names
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-01-21 19:52:08
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v3

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: svnDate: 2010-01-21 20:20:13
Subject: SVN Commit by guillaume: r8164 - in branches/REL-1_10_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3/pgadmin: dlg schema
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-01-21 19:38:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group