Patches are welcome
I haven't looked at the spec, but I also think this is outside of the
spec, but we have discussed it and feel it is intuitive enough to
On 13-Oct-06, at 4:58 AM, Bendik Rognlien Johansen wrote:
> In PL/Java:
> String values = (String) rs.getObject(column);
> Regular driver:
> String values = (String) rs.getArray(column).getArray();
> On Oct 11, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Markus Schaber wrote:
>> Hi, Bendik,
>> Bendik Rognlien Johansen wrote:
>>> yes you are right, I don't really understand Generics that well.
>>> But it
>>> is a little clearer now :-)
>>> Anyway, I was hoping there would be a clean way to get arrays
>>> from the
>>> result set, Generics or not, using a single method. I would like
>>> to avoid:
>>> getStringArray, getIntegerArray etc.
>> Usually, ResultSet.getArray() should do it.
>>> The reason I need to do this is that I use two different drivers for
>>> PostgreSQL with the same code, and they handle arrays differently.
>> So you say that the the other one (pljava, IIRC) maps a postgresql
>> integer to an java.lang.Integer in java, and not an int like
>> Looks strange.
>> Does the jdbc spec promote one or the other behaviour?
>> However, I don't know a clean solution.
>> Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
>> Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
>> Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
> ---------------------------(end of
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Markus Schaber||Date: 2006-10-13 11:52:57|
|Subject: Re: "Hanging Connection" blocks access to table (JBossMQ)|
|Previous:||From: Markus Schaber||Date: 2006-10-13 09:29:14|
|Subject: Re: Retrieving arrays|