Re: Printing query durations

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Kevin Dorne <kevin(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Printing query durations
Date: 2006-03-28 03:01:26
Message-ID: C2617EFB-3E07-431A-988A-CEBF85C41544@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Kevin,

There is no difference between a jdbc query and a psql query. The
backend doesn't know where the query comes from.

DAve
On 27-Mar-06, at 8:26 PM, Kevin Dorne wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am having some trouble getting PostgreSQL to log durations with
> statements when called through JDBC. They appear just fine with
> interactive queries using psql, but the duration field does not
> show up
> on JDBC queries.
>
> Is there some configuration I need to pass to the JDBC driver?
>
> Example output from an interactive query:
> LOG: duration: 109.524 ms statement: SELECT count(*) FROM
> transaction;
>
> Example output from a JDBC query:
> LOG: statement: SELECT count(*) FROM transaction;
>
> Cheers,
> -k
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-28 03:09:54 Re: gcj has a lot of complaints about 8.1-405 release
Previous Message Kevin Dorne 2006-03-28 01:26:49 Printing query durations