Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Stuart Bishop" <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
Date: 2007-12-20 01:51:13
Message-ID: C2595330-2263-460A-AA87-1E087B4A474C@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Dec 19, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> It is pretty much common knowledge that
>
> I think we have too much "common knowledge".


Yeah. For a lot of folks it's still common knowledge that you should  
only set shared_buffers to 10% of memory...
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Decibel!Date: 2007-12-20 01:54:12
Subject: Re: Minimizing dead tuples caused by update triggers
Previous:From: Decibel!Date: 2007-12-20 01:45:25
Subject: Re: Measuring table and index bloat

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group