Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?

From: Mikkel Høgh <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
Date: 2008-10-13 08:51:30
Message-ID: BEF0B6B6-8EAB-4082-B81C-819FA0982C0B@hoegh.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Well, in that benchmark, what you say is only true for the Niagara
processors. On the Opteron page, MySQL performance only drops slightly
as concurrency passes 50.

MySQL might have a problem with Niagara, but it doesn't seem like it
has the severe concurrency vulnerability you speak of.

There are many reasons to pick PostgreSQL, but this one doesn't seem
to be a general thing. In general, MySQL seems to have problems with
some kinds of threading, since their perfomance on Mac OS X is crappy
as well for that reason.
--
Kind regards,

Mikkel Høgh <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>

On 13/10/2008, at 10.43, Greg Smith wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> It may well be that in a more realistic testing that mysql keeps up
>> through 5 or 10 client connections then collapses at 40 or 50,
>> while pgsql keeps climbing in performance.
>
> One of the best pro-PostgreSQL comparisons showing this behavior is
> at http://tweakers.net/reviews/649/7 MySQL owns that benchmark until
> you hit 40 users, then...ouch.
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com
> Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message admin 2008-10-13 09:08:24 Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-10-13 08:43:10 Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-10-13 10:17:31 Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-10-13 08:43:10 Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?