Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?

From: cb <cb(at)mythtech(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Date: 2009-11-17 01:12:58
Message-ID: BB5180D2-8E3B-41A2-BAD7-EAF0C1434BD5@mythtech.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> I'm not sure what the answer is to your actual question, but I'd
> highly recommend upgrading to 8.3 or 8.4. The performance is likely
> to be a lot better, and 8.0/8.1 are no longer supported on Windows.

Ugh, yeah, I'd love to upgrade but the powers that get to make that
decision have no interest in upgrading. So I'm stuck on 8.0.4, and
since I really don't do the PG support itself, I don't even get to
voice much of an opinion (I deal really just with making sure the
physical hardware is doing what it needs to do, which is where the
disk defrag comes in to play).

-chris
<www.mythtech.net>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message cb 2009-11-17 01:22:25 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-17 00:01:49 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?