>Tom Lane said:
> > "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> x, y := r;
> > That strikes me as a really bad idea. It weakens both syntax and
> > semantic error checking, to accomplish how much?
>Where does the idea come from anyway? Has it been discussed on -hackers? I
>don't recall seeing it. Just sending in a patch for a "feature" you think
>a good idea seems like a sub-optimal process.
No, this only my idea. I miss this functionality in fors and fore stmts. You
are true, so is better start discussion on this topic on hackers. But I
can't send attachments to -hackers. And I am not hacker or developer. I did
patch only. All others is on core hackers.
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-20 22:18:49|
|Subject: Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... |
|Previous:||From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig||Date: 2005-12-20 21:40:52|
|Subject: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...|