>1. Why did you base the datatype on cstring? That's inappropriate for
>anything except guaranteed-short strings, because it's not toastable.
It's only my laziness. I can adapt patch for TEXT. It's only temporary
solution. The goal is true xml type.
>2. Is it really necessary to hack up the grammar for this? Seems like
>you should create ordinary functions to manipulate the datatype(s).
>If every datatype thought it could do this sort of thing, we'd have
>a completely unmanageable grammar.
> regards, tom lane
I prefere any general solution. But there isn't. I hope SQL/XML syntax is
exception and the solution SQL/XML function is relative clean. There was
ideas about pretranslators from different syntaxs. Is this idea dead?
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-09-12 17:53:28|
|Subject: Re: docs: config chapter|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-09-12 16:56:30|
|Subject: Re: Autovacuum docs|