Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: mail(at)joeconway(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]
Date: 2006-08-04 04:43:08
Message-ID: BAY20-F143AB0B68CABA5DB334B10F9500@phx.gbl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
>
>Good point. One question: are we happy calling this a 'VALUES list'? It's
>better than a 'table value constructor'. I took the lead from a comment in 
>the
>source.
>

table value constructor is name from ANSI. All people wiil find t.v.c., not 
values list. I vote table value constructor.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci. 
http://messenger.msn.cz/


In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-04 04:56:26
Subject: Re: VALUES clause memory optimization
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2006-08-04 04:27:16
Subject: Re: VALUES clause memory optimization

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-08-04 04:45:43
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-04 04:37:10
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-04 04:56:26
Subject: Re: VALUES clause memory optimization
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2006-08-04 04:27:16
Subject: Re: VALUES clause memory optimization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group