Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

select on 22 GB table causes "An I/O error occured while sending to the backend." exception

From: henk de wit <henk53602(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: select on 22 GB table causes "An I/O error occured while sending to the backend." exception
Date: 2008-08-26 16:44:02
Message-ID: BAY124-W57D3654AF1159CAF8EAC19F5660@phx.gbl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi,

We're currently having a problem with queries on a medium sized table. This table is 22GB in size (via select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('table'));). It has 7 indexes, which bring the total size of the table to 35 GB (measured with pg_total_relation_size).

On this table we're inserting records with a relatively low frequency of +- 6~10 per second. We're using PG 8.3.1 on a machine with two dual core 2.4Ghz XEON CPUs, 16 GB of memory and Debian Linux. The machine is completely devoted to PG, nothing else runs on the box.

Lately we're getting a lot of exceptions from the Java process that does these inserts: "An I/O error occured while sending to the backend." No other information is provided with this exception (besides the stack trace of course). The pattern is that for about a minute, almost every insert to this 22 GB table results in this exception. After this minute everything is suddenly fine and PG happily accepts all inserts again. We tried to nail the problem down, and it seems that every time this happens, a select query on this same table is in progress. This select query starts right before the insert problems begin and most often right after this select query finishes executing, inserts are fine again. Sometimes though inserts only fail in the middle of the execution of this select query. E.g. if the select query starts at 12:00 and ends at 12:03, inserts fail from 12:01 to 12:02.

We have spend a lot of hours in getting to the bottom of this, but our ideas for fixing this problem are more or less exhausted at the moment.

I wonder if anyone recognizes this problem and could give some pointers to stuff that we could investigate next. 

Thanks a lot in advance.

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jerry ChamplinDate: 2008-08-26 16:45:31
Subject: Re: Autovacuum does not stay turned off
Previous:From: Frank JoerdensDate: 2008-08-26 16:37:32
Subject: Query w empty result set with LIMIT orders of magnitude slower than without

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group