From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: plpgsql, return can contains any expression |
Date: | 2006-09-15 07:31:17 |
Message-ID: | BAY114-F15F05EBE3B03FFDD5A8A37F92E0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>
>"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This patch allows using any row expression in return statement and does
> > transformation from untyped row to composite types if it's necessary.
>
>This patch doesn't seem to cope with cases where the supplied tuple has
>the wrong number of columns, and it doesn't look like it's being careful
>about dropped columns either. Also, that's a mighty bizarre-looking
>choice of cache memory context in coerce_to_tuple ... but then again,
>why are you bothering with a cache at all for temporary arrays?
I am sorry, Tom. But I don't understand. I can check number of columns,
ofcourse and I'll do it. What cache for temporary arrays do you mean?
Best regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2006-09-15 07:52:53 | lower() not working correctly...? |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-09-15 07:30:19 | Re: Release notes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-15 14:56:58 | Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql, return can contains any expression |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-15 05:27:04 | Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love |