Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-14 22:14:50
Message-ID: BANLkTinkEs4KvcihyF9pOzjoK1mEy4P_wQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
The one about the versions :-p

Seriously though, no, we don't support 7.3 - iirc we agreed to drop
that a few years back. I'm fine with un-supporting 8.0 and 8.1 too.

On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic
<jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Let's play jeopardy:
> Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?
>
> OR
>
> Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?
>
> Which question matches your answer?
>
> 2011/6/14 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> Yes, I think so.
>
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic
> <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> =)
>> BTW:
>> [...]The application may be used on Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OSX and Windows platforms to manage PostgreSQL 7.3 and above running on any platform[...]
>>
>> Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?
>> Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?
>>
>> 2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:57 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
>>> >> Excuse me? *g*
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Yeah, I don't think I'll have the time to work on new features now. Too
>>> > much other things to do.
>>>
>>> I think Jasmine is alluding to the object search patch that's in progress :-)
>>>
>>
>> Oops, sorry, forgot that patch.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume
>>   http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
>>   http://www.dalibo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
>

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-06-14 22:22:32
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-06-14 21:38:54
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group