Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-05 20:16:55
Message-ID: BANLkTinRHxgs7YZF6YDEWY=G=J0B8NUbJA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> However, it would in a lot of cases be very useful to have osmething
>> like CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE <blah>. Which would only accept
>> temporary (and maybe unlogged) tables. And then would auto-create the
>> PG_<version>_<catversion> directory upon startup.
>>
>> That's obviously a 9.2 feature though, it's not an adjustment of an
>> existing one, it's brand new :-)
>
> Yes, that's a nice feature for 9.2

+1.  That's a really nice idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: A.M.Date: 2011-05-05 20:49:25
Subject: Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-05-05 20:15:42
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua BerkusDate: 2011-05-05 20:44:58
Subject: Call for quotes for 9.1 Release
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-05-05 20:15:42
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group