| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-03 18:55:28 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinQBTwXv5ZDrAcu+oTbt9xXJFd3mQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 3 May 2011 19:45, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 20:07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Part of the problem is the name we're using for the feature. "Unlogged
>> tables" sounds like we've taken something away and are calling that a
>> feature. "Now with no brakes!" As feature names go, it's as unsexy as
>> you can get.
>
> "nosql tables"? ;)
In all seriousness, I think it's important we should not mention
anything like that at any point. :S
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-03 18:56:46 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-05-03 18:54:45 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-05-03 18:55:47 | Re: Prefered Types |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-05-03 18:54:45 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |