Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-14 21:33:57
Message-ID: BANLkTin0Ldb1DOX1PrQcQv2CnTPZuPgB0A@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Yes, I think so.

On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic
<jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> =)
> BTW:
> [...]The application may be used on Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OSX and Windows platforms to manage PostgreSQL 7.3 and above running on any platform[...]
>
> Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?
> Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?
>
> 2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
>
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:57 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
>> >> Excuse me? *g*
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yeah, I don't think I'll have the time to work on new features now. Too
>> > much other things to do.
>>
>> I think Jasmine is alluding to the object search patch that's in progress :-)
>>
>
> Oops, sorry, forgot that patch.
>
>
> --
> Guillaume
>   http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
>   http://www.dalibo.com
>
>
>
>

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-06-14 21:38:54
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-06-14 21:30:35
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group