Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Windows build issues

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows build issues
Date: 2011-04-03 14:04:41
Message-ID: BANLkTimuRH+T069076NXMDS=TH3wkmZsqA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 22:10, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tor, 2011-03-31 at 16:00 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 03/31/2011 03:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > So is 2010 supported, and where is the vcbuild program supposed to come
>> > from?
>> >
>>
>>
>> Not that I know of. But VS 2008 is, and should be readily available. In
>> fact, I recently made patches to allow it to to be used to build all the
>> live branches.
>
> The documentation appears to claim that the Platform/Windows SDK without
> any Visual Studio should be enough.  Is there also an upper limit on the
> supported SDK version then?

It certainly used to be enough, so I guess if they have bounced the
version of the VC compiler that's included in the SDK then yes, there
needs to be an upper bound on it.

What version is the compiler that comes along with the SDK reporting?
(not the VS Express one, the one in the SDK itself)

Guessing fromhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_SDK, maybe
we need to say up to v6.1 for now?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-04-03 16:38:37
Subject: Re: FDW state from plan time
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-04-03 09:32:34
Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group