Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: oom_killer

From: Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oom_killer
Date: 2011-04-22 16:37:23
Message-ID: BANLkTimi4EsNLjEf4rVvTYsm4UEZSSJFGA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I appreciate the totally no postgres responses with this.
>
> I didn't understand that.  What do you mean?
>
> -Kevin

I meant that when starting to talk about kernel commit limits/ etc,
it's not really postgres centric, but you folks are still assisting me
with this.  So thanks, some could say take it to Linux kernels, even
though this is killing postgres.

Tory

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Cédric VillemainDate: 2011-04-22 16:45:25
Subject: Re: oom_killer
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-04-22 16:34:03
Subject: Re: oom_killer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group