Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, gabriele(dot)garuglieri(at)infoblu(dot)it, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks
Date: 2011-04-17 08:23:39
Message-ID: BANLkTimF4L=7sL9Ew7yw8ueFTn4w5keC3g@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-www
2011/4/17 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>:
>
> On Apr 17, 2011 1:32 AM, "Josh Kupershmidt" <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> [CC'ing the -www list, since this affects the PDFs provided by the
>> website. Ugh, and resending without attachments since it looks like
>> the last attempt didn't make it to the list.]
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:15 AM,  <gabriele(dot)garuglieri(at)infoblu(dot)it> wrote:
>> > the 9.0.2 has them, but 9.0.3 pdf documentation is missing the
>> > bookmarks.
>> > When looking for something is a real pain having to always use find or
>> > switch back to TOC pages.
>> >
>> > Any chance that you can generate and republish a corrected doc?
>>
>> Hi Gabriele,
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to report this, and sorry for the delay in
>> following up. Just to clarify what (I think) Gabriele is complaining
>> about, here [1] is a screenshot from the Okular viewer of the
>> 9.0.3 -A4 or -US PDFs from the website [2]. You can see that the
>> "Contents" pane in the top left is greyed out [3].
>>
>> When I built these PDFs from the 9.0.3 tarball myself, the results
>> looked better [4]. Assuming this fixes Gabriele's problem, could we
>> update the website with the fixed versions [5] of the 9.0.3 PDFs?
>
> Could this be because of the efforts to reduce the size of the pdf's that
> was implemented a while ago?
>
>> Also, I noticed that the page of PDFs is not consistent with the PDF
>> naming scheme wrt. minor version numbers. We provide e.g.
>> "postgresql-8.4.6-A4.pdf" and "postgresql-9.0-A4.pdf". Personally, I
>> like having the minor version number included, but could we just be
>> consistent either way?
>
> We have a standard now, 8.4 just predates it. The standard is without the
> minor version, and the reasining behind this is both that it decreases
> storage requiremenyåts and more imoortant that a new version doesn't
> invalidate all old links, both on our own sites and othets...
>

In http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/  the 8.4 pdf file is the
only one misnamed then.


> /Magnus
>



-- 
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Josh KupershmidtDate: 2011-04-17 15:22:32
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-04-17 06:57:17
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh KupershmidtDate: 2011-04-17 15:22:32
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-04-17 06:57:17
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group