Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The shared buffers challenge

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The shared buffers challenge
Date: 2011-05-26 16:37:56
Message-ID: BANLkTim6zqdbLSX4wnO35rY33nLiR9XC-g@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The point is what we can prove, because going through the
> motions of doing that is useful.

Exactly, and whatever you can "prove" will be workload-dependant.
So you can't prove anything "generally", since no single setting is
best for all.

> You are also totally missing my
> other thrust, which is that future changes to how things work could
> change the dynamics of .conf configuration

Nope, I'm not missing it, simply not commenting on it.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2011-05-26 16:45:38
Subject: Re: The shared buffers challenge
Previous:From: Dave JohansenDate: 2011-05-26 16:21:45
Subject: Re: LIMIT and UNION ALL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group