| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The shared buffers challenge |
| Date: | 2011-05-27 19:04:21 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTim0S_F-mqBWmhYmGFQi_T-zLoOo8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Any attempt to make a serious change to the documentation around performance
> turns into a bikeshedding epic, where the burden of proof to make a change
> is too large to be worth the trouble to me anymore. I first started
> publishing tuning papers outside of the main docs because it was the path of
> least resistance to actually getting something useful in front of people.
> After failing to get even basic good recommendations for
> checkpoint_segments into the docs, I completely gave up on focusing there as
> my primary way to spread this sort of information.
Hmm. That's rather unfortunate. +1 for revisiting that topic, if you
have the energy for it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2011-05-27 19:24:38 | Re: The shared buffers challenge |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-05-27 18:57:27 | Re: The shared buffers challenge |