On 15 June 2011 09:34, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 15 June 2011 05:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011:
>>>> I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix.
>>>> Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is
>>>> this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until
>>>> the final release?
>>> ... or is Stefan just too busy?
>> It needn't all fall upon Stefan surely? I wouldn't mind looking into
>> it if it isn't already being worked on.
> No, it doesn't all need to fall upon Stefan. It's just that he's
> usually been doing it, so I think people have just been backing off to
> let him do it again :-) Stefan - clearly we have volunteers to help
> out to do it if you don't want to/have the time. Just speak up :)
We haven't heard anything further on this. Is it under development?
We're approaching our 3rd beta in 2 weeks so would be nice to get
something up soonish.
Stefan, are you still okay to do this, or would you prefer others have
a go at adding it this time?
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner||Date: 2011-06-28 17:35:05|
|Subject: Re: 9.1 feature matrix|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2011-06-25 04:41:20|
|Subject: Re: Pgfoundry problem with Npgsql bug tracker|