Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Williams <joshwilliams(at)ij(dot)net>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>, Ian Bailey-Leung <ian(at)hardcircle(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-05 07:25:34
Message-ID: BANLkTikS2QUXxXxn3NxFg3+L5BPhtFz2zg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
2011/5/4 Josh Williams <joshwilliams(at)ij(dot)net>:
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 00:52 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>> If we could a word that starts with H after Write, the feature would be
>> "WHAT"
>>
>> Sorry, could not resist. I just remembered HOT.
>
> Contents Outside Ordinary Logging tables?
>
> (shrug) :)
>
> -- Josh

Or

Tables On Significant Speed (as in you are toss'ing your data away)

(I actually like COOL tables)

-- 
Rob Wultsch
wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2011-05-05 07:35:06
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2011-05-05 03:19:56
Subject: Re: Some surprising precedence behavior in PG's grammar

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2011-05-05 07:35:06
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2011-05-04 23:45:43
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group