Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
Date: 2011-04-03 23:57:34
Message-ID: BANLkTikQevjsBMr8VOa=5j_aURcSe=XkRg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:44:23AM +0100, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
>> Please find attached v2 of the numeric-doc patch, which takes into
>> account your remarks. In particular, numeric limits are now correct
>> and documented only in that table.
>
> This version looks sound to me.  Thank you.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 01:53:57
Subject: Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-03 23:51:46
Subject: Re: found a very confusing and maybe outdated sentence

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group