On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> I see Robert committed that one already. If there's a consensus that
> omitting the pid for committed transactions is the right thing to do,
> I'm happy to put together a patch. I think that is a better approach
> than trying to keep it after commit until the connection closes, but
> all of this is sufficiently minor that it's probably not worth worrying
> much about.

I couldn't really figure out why that would be better, but if there's
a reason I'm fine with it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• Re: time table for beta1 at 2011-04-04 18:37:07 from Dan Ports

Responses

• Re: time table for beta1 at 2011-04-04 18:50:37 from Kevin Grittner

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-04-04 18:48:49
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-04-04 18:42:07
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations