Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: time-delayed standbys

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys
Date: 2011-06-29 07:46:05
Message-ID: BANLkTikHVwbCRjGkuMCXQcJnW7RYVP0zAA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Or, we should
> implement new "promote" mode which finishes a recovery as soon as
> "promote" is requested (i.e., not replay all the available WAL records)?

That's not a new feature. We had it in 8.4, but it was removed.

Originally, we supported "fast" failover via trigger file.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-06-29 08:00:40
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-06-29 03:52:08
Subject: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group