Re: Branch 1.14?

Excuse me? *g*

2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>

> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > >> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > PostgreSQL already created a 9.1 branch, so that new features could
> be
> > >> > commited on head. Actually, there'll be a commitfest starting
> tomorrow.
> > >> > Should we also create a new branch, so that new features could be
> > >> > applied on head?
> > >> >
> > >> > I have no features right now to commit and push, but it could be
> > >> > interesting nevertheless.
> > >>
> > >> If there's nothing to commit, then all it means it that we'll have to
> > >> start double-patching bugfixes for no gain.
> > >>
> > >
> > > OK, so we open it as soon as we have a commit to push?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
> Seems good to me. I don't expect to have new features soon anyway,
> except the Luis's project.
>
>
> --
> Guillaume
> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> http://www.dalibo.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>