Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-14 22:22:32
Message-ID: BANLkTik4mr_CWiMXOznT+GLT1XaOrOxxKA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
I absolutely agree. In this case, I think, we should remove old
compatibility checks in the code from time to time. I was shocked when I saw
BackendMinimumVersion(7,3) - I thought that I have to check the
search-feature against 7.3 *g*

2011/6/15 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>

> The one about the versions :-p
>
> Seriously though, no, we don't support 7.3 - iirc we agreed to drop
> that a few years back. I'm fine with un-supporting 8.0 and 8.1 too.
>
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic
> <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Let's play jeopardy:
> > Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?
> >
> > OR
> >
> > Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version
> supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?
> >
> > Which question matches your answer?
> >
> > 2011/6/14 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> > Yes, I think so.
> >
> > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic
> > <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> =)
> >> BTW:
> >> [...]The application may be used on Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OSX and
> Windows platforms to manage PostgreSQL 7.3 and above running on any
> platform[...]
> >>
> >> Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?
> >> Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version
> supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?
> >>
> >> 2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> wrote:
> >>> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:57 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> >>> >> Excuse me? *g*
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > Yeah, I don't think I'll have the time to work on new features now.
> Too
> >>> > much other things to do.
> >>>
> >>> I think Jasmine is alluding to the object search patch that's in
> progress :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Oops, sorry, forgot that patch.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Guillaume
> >>   http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> >>   http://www.dalibo.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Dave Page
> > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> > Twitter: @pgsnake
> >
> > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-06-14 22:41:19
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-06-14 22:14:50
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group