| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Process local hint bit cache |
| Date: | 2011-06-29 13:43:57 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=xNENkYe1NHhsPKcdL8TTqqasEKw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> int ByteOffset = xid / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>>>
>>> whoops, I just notice this was wrong -- the byte offset needs to be
>>> taking bucket into account. I need to clean this up some more
>>> obviously, but the issues at play remain the same....
>>
>> So, where is the latest version of this patch?
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=553
Oh, shoot. When I looked at this last night, I thought that link went
somewhere else. Woops.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yeb Havinga | 2011-06-29 13:44:18 | Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-29 13:42:06 | Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE |