On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> int ByteOffset = xid / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>>> whoops, I just notice this was wrong -- the byte offset needs to be
>>> taking bucket into account. I need to clean this up some more
>>> obviously, but the issues at play remain the same....
>> So, where is the latest version of this patch?
Oh, shoot. When I looked at this last night, I thought that link went
somewhere else. Woops.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Yeb Havinga||Date: 2011-06-29 13:44:18|
|Subject: Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-06-29 13:42:06|
|Subject: Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE|