From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: getting to beta |
Date: | 2011-04-21 16:41:05 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=nYmmCA9e0n_sk3a6OvKNGzEDq-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> 1. All of the SSI patches have been dealt with.
>
> I'll add the non-serializable UPDATE performance issue. Dan has
> been benchmarking to try to find a worst case; I don't want to speak
> for him too much, but as he was headed off to lecture a class he
> sent me results so far, and with beta so close I figure I should
> pass along a rough outline. The worst case he has been able to
> construct so far was running 32 active processes on a 16 processor
> machine in an update-mostly mix against a database on tmpfs (so no
> disk writes) on a dataset which fits inside shared_memory. This was
> able to generate enough contention on an exclusive LW lock to cause
> a 0.7% slowdown.
>
> Speaking for myself, I believe we'll be able to provide a very small
> patch to eliminate this. Probably today or tomorrow. While in a
> less extreme runtime environment it would probably be hard to pick
> out a performance impact in the normal noise, I expect the fix to be
> small and safe enough to be worth doing.
>
> I do feel that it would be good to apply the one-line fix Heikki
> posted, which is orthogonal and needed in any event. That would
> give a little time for others to easily test it before beta.
Please add that patch to the open items list if it is not there already.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-21 16:42:30 | Re: "stored procedures" |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-21 16:39:44 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |