Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>, Ian Bailey-Leung <ian(at)hardcircle(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-04 21:50:44
Message-ID: BANLkTi=mPWwxaju72VuyEBrQLRUDcL0Gqw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>
>>> +1 for Fast Tables.
>>
>> so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
>> name is pretty misleading.
>
> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> out there with "lightening tables".  Built for speed but not
> persistence.
>

oh! that's easy! "mysql tables" or "pgISAM tables" ;)

-- 
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2011-05-04 21:52:08
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2011-05-04 21:44:53
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2011-05-04 21:52:08
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2011-05-04 21:44:53
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group