Re: Changing the sponsors page

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 16:06, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 13, 2011 9:58 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> >>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
>>>> >>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and
>>>> >> just
>>>> >> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of
>>>> >> getting
>>>> >> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
>>>> >
>>>> > Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
>>>> > my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
>>>> > sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
>>>> > for over three years now.
>>>>
>>>> Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
>>>> then you know what my memory is like.
>>>
>>> Pretty sure I've mentioned it to you. But the "formal asking" was to at
>>> least one, but I think both, the Josh:es.
>>
>> That's not what is documented here: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sponsoring
>
> AFAICS, that page says nothing about whom to contact to get on the
> list, so I contacted a couple of the members on the committee. It
> seemed logical...

Sorry - I meant that the process to get on the list was defined as a
vote by the four people on the list. Not that the method of contacting
them was well-defined. :)

Perhaps our sponsorship committee could clarify this process a bit. (cc'd)

-selena

--
http://chesnok.com